I tend to agree with scientist that there are signs of global warming. But, for many it has become like a religion. No matter what facts are presented to contrary, pro global warming people dismiss them. But, to sit there and say that every scientist agrees with global warming is an outright lie. It is not a fact, a fact is 2 + 2 is 4. Global Warming will become a fact when it is proven to be and it cannot be reasonably denied.

I have read a couple of books on it and a few magazine articles. I do not claim to be an expert at all. I have put a reasonable amount of time in to it and I believe it is at least enough to offer an opinion on the subject.

These are my concerns. We have no idea what the fuck we are talking about when it comes to global warming. Even those that believe it is happening can’t agree on how to fix it. This is serious problem because about every 10 thousand years we have an ice age. It’s been like 12 thousand years or since the last one. We are overdue. It would be nice to avoid this but what happens if we do? The earth has a process, interrupt it and what will that do? But, let’s say stopping it is a good thing. So how do we do it? Is it too much c02 or is it actually too much or not enough water vapor? These things are so precise, that the smallest error can mean catastrophe.

People want to cut back on c02 admissions but these are the same guys that complained about the hole in the ozone 15 years ago. Then end was coming they claimed. If we don’t take immediate action we’re all doomed, they said. We took some action, we banned some hair spray containers some auto manufactures changed the way they did AC in cars but the scientists and alarmists claimed it wasn’t enough. But, guess what, the hole is no longer there, it closed up all by itself. Even the scientists who said it wasn’t enough seem to all admit that the efforts we took really were not what caused the hole to close itself. They don’t know how it closed or why, they just know that it did.

Now that, that terror has been averted, global warming is the new battle cry. Is it worth study, absolutely. But, we need real studies, real facts, and real double blind experiments that can be repeated. Then we need real solutions that can stand real scrutiny.

I am reminded of the mountain glaciers in South America. Global warming activists were all too willing to use them as proof as global warming. A lot of them were melting. Ice that was providing water enough to last some local tribes three hundred years or more. Turns out with the caps of these mountains melting that it might not last 25 more years. Tragic! However, it turns out, the melting of the caps had nothing to with “global warming”. The areas around these mountains used to be lush forest areas that have now been devastated by deforestation. The tree huggers were right. Cutting down trees is bad, Its just that it had nothing to do c02 emissions. What it turns out to be is that those surrounding forests kept the heat in. That dark green jungles absorbed that heat and moisture. Once it was gone, that heat rose and the ice on the mountain tops began to melt. Once again, the global warming people were wrong.

This is why it is so important to study, research and do double blind tests. There’s a reason why the FDA requires all drug companies to use double blind tests. It prevents junk science. It keeps people honest. Right now there is no double blind anything in the scientific community. Any scientist can make any claim he wants and publish it. People will believe him or not but as for requiring actual proof, it’s not really required. I mean Stephen Hawking, the smartest man in the world, now admits he was wrong in what he had believed in for the past 20 years or more. We need more than just “peer review” and that’s all scientists have right now.

I am sorry but until they can present a clean and undeniable fact that cannot be reasonably argued than we are wasting our time. Not every scientists who doesn’t believe in global warming is a crackpot. I do believe it’s a serious, what I am saying here is that we do not treat it serious enough. We need unbiased studies and research that can stand the scrutiny of peer review and double blind tests. We need not opinion but true fact. Just because shit is melting in a few places isn’t proof of anything more than that shit is melting in a few places. There is significant evidence that ice is growing in other areas but this fact is all too often ignored. We need real science here, not the pseudo religious cults we have now.